Tuesday, February 27, 2007
OUR IHC TEST IS A FUCKING FARCE, FULL OF BULLSHIT. Let's see why.
Let me see.
When Kim II Sung wanted to invade South Korea, he went to seek Stalin's permission. Stalin said no, so he didn't invade. After awhile, Kim II Sung wanted to invade South Korea again, so he went to Stalin to ask for permission. This time, Stalin said yes, and Kim II Sung went ahead with the invasion.
Stalin provided military support and training for Kim II Sung's army.
DID STALIN PLAY A PART IN THE KOREAN WAR AT ALL? OF COURSE NOT.
Let's put this into simpler terms.
Person A want to shoot Person B. But he chooses to ask Person C for permission. Person C says no. Person A doesn't shoot. After a few days, Person A wants to shoot Person B. He asks Person C for permission. This time, Person C say yes, then provides the training to refine his shooting technique, along with a couple of spare bullets.
Did Person C play a part in Person's A shooting of Person B?
ACCORDING TO VIVIEN SIM IT DOESN'T SHOW.
OKOK MOVING ON MOVING ON.
Conflict arises mostly due to resources than territories. Do you agree?
First of all, i said I AGREE COMPLETELY. And she went to underline it which was pretty stupid since even if i said i AGREE COMPLETELY, it doesn't matter if i said I AGREE TO A LARGE EXTENT, because if you think about it, the question already said "most".
BUT WAIT, THAT'S NOT ALL.
Let me give a few more similarly-phrased questions.
Idiots arise mostly due to nurture than nature. Do you agree?
Dumb IHC teachers arise mostly due to innate stupidity than pure stupidity. Do you agree?
One would think that the question asks for reasons and explanations behind why dumb ihc teachers arise. But according to the IHC teachers, you need to explain what sort of manifestations these idiots come in the form of. Like Chan, Sim, etc. I wonder why we don't need to explain the history of Dumb IHC teachers, its definitions and influences over the people around them. I also don't know why they don't ask if Dumb IHC teachers are smarter than a dog. Why? Why?
BECAUSE THE QUESTION DOESN'T ASK WHY. WHY THEN, DO WE HAVE TO EXPLAIN WHAT SORT OF CONFLICT IS MANIFESTED?
Ho hum, no point being polite and shit, because all they do is spit out a bunch of irrelevant crap and throw it back into your face. They don't even care, so might as well do good for the society and announce what a farce this IHC test is.
For awhile i pitied Vivien Sim for the way 4N handled her, but i quickly realised she ain't really worth it, especially now that i feel it for myself. Let's spill out some quotes from her and point out all her moral hypocrisy.
So we don't offer a thank you when she marks our paper, or a thank you card during teacher's day. So she goes on a tirade of self-righteous crap about how teachers work so hard to help us, in a pathetic attempt to exude a facade of high moral valueeessssss that she is trying her GOSHDARNBEST TO INSTILL INTO US.
Well, let's see. How much do you really work for us really. Borrow a couple of videos from the library, make us teach ourselves, give us worksheets for us to fill in ourselves. That's really hard work Sim! You have to mark a few classes' worth of essays over the course of 8 weeks and let us teach ourselves! Ahh, how i admire your heroic efforts in spurring our class to greater heights! You do a basic job of teaching us, and expect us to show our gratitude to you. YOU'RE PAID TO DO IT, and i don't think any of the class thinks you actually go out of your way to help us.
Oh oh, and let's spout some more crap about how, in the "O" levels, we don't even have the chance to clarify or argue. That's irrelevant. In fact, that reflects badly, because even though the world is unfair, the correct thing to do is to make it as fair as possible, whenever possible. That's what one would expect from a teacher with such integrity deserving of our worshit.
Oh, and if i remember correctly, you claimed you were fine with us not giving examples of conflict. That, you say, we must refer to Chan. Does this imply then, that you agree with us, that we should not be penalized because of this ridiculous flaw in the answer scheme? Do you not think, it is YOUR responsibility to fight for what is right, to ensure the fairest, most just answer scheme is available for the students, so you can live out to your responsibilities? LOL I GUESS NO, JUST TAKE THE EASY WAY OUT AND ASK US TO "you can refer to channy".
And i hate the ridiculous body language Sim uses. Shaking your head at my answer, trying your best attempt to impress upon me that my point was unbelievably insufficient and that you can't believe i actually questioned you on the mark. But of course, Person C so did not contribute to Person's A shooting of Person B at all, so np!np! you are the best!
But who cares, the whole sec 4 cohort agrees with me that the ihc test is a fucking farce. Oh, i hath proof of it!
silverletal [Simple and Clean] 3:39 AM
